That guy, from like, before.
The serfs love a Czar...
Published on October 13, 2010 By bakerstreet In Politics

     The question early on was whether we were going to be aware, smart Americans governing ourselves, or the mob, governed by the elite.  Jeffersonian, Federalist, yadda yadda.  The simple like a Czar, or perhaps the fearful would be more accurate.  Classicalist ideals expected a highly educated, aware population to be, well, classical.  We shall all don our togas and go to the local forum to debate politics and manage ourselves.  It doesn’t seem to work out that way.

     National defense certainly isn’t something you can leave to local governments, so war favors the Federalist and presents a foothold that often sticks thereafter.  Lincoln (far more heinously than he is remembered...) in the civil war, FDR, solidification during the cold war, 9/11.  Each time more of what we need done, and the money it takes to pay for it, shifts to Washington.  Then there’s disasters, famine, flood... fear.  When something needs fixin, we want Daddy to cut through all the red tape and just do it.

     That doesn’t seem to change with our level of education as was expected.  Just the opposite if the last presidential election is any indication.  The one thing I think we hate more than an overlord is, well, each other.  There is something intensely appealing about having someone “on your side” who is above everyone else.  It’s very Godfather, American politics.  “Don Obama, please, you gotta help, whatamigonnado?”

     Which... is silly.  We trade away our ability to govern ourselves by weakly fawning over a figurehead.  And why?  Because we secretly want a bully to impose our will for us.  Sadly though, the farther from your front door you have to go to find the decision makers, the less control over them you will have.  We nod along with silly campaign promises that aren’t even within presidential power quite often, just because we want to believe they are the All Powerful Oz coming to save us, or more accurately, rain doom on our peasant foes.

     This attitude spans both parties, even third parties. LaRouche, Perot, heck, Teddy Roosevelt.   Third parties aren’t any different.  No party is taken seriously if they don’t have faces that can win elections, and the faces become the election.  This is intensely important because when politics is about faces, political ideology, philosophy, become empty talk.  That’s what the platforms of both parties are right now, talk.  Neither Republicans nor Democrats in practice resemble their traditional definitions whatsoever.

     Sadly, we don’t care.  American politics is a big Kleenex box.  We fall in love with a face, elect it, grow apart, pull out another one.  Wash, rinse, repeat, all the while whole forests are needed to print the laws being passed we don’t even bother to notice.  A few outrage us, cause us to toss our current Kleenex a little early, but it’s not true self-governance, it’s falling out of love with an icon.

    It was the same in Rome, in the Bible, even. “Give us a King!!”, the Hebrews cry and God sighs wearily.  It’s interesting what God’s reply is:

1Sam.8

[10] And Samuel told all the words of the LORD unto the people that asked of him a king.
[11] And he said, This will be the manner of the king that shall reign over you: He will take your sons, and appoint them for himself, for his chariots, and to be his horsemen; and some shall run before his chariots.
[12] And he will appoint him captains over thousands, and captains over fifties; and will set them to ear his ground, and to reap his harvest, and to make his instruments of war, and instruments of his chariots.
[13] And he will take your daughters to be confectionaries, and to be cooks, and to be bakers.
[14] And he will take your fields, and your vineyards, and your oliveyards, even the best of them, and give them to his servants.
[15] And he will take the tenth of your seed, and of your vineyards, and give to his officers, and to his servants.
[16] And he will take your menservants, and your maidservants, and your goodliest young men, and your asses, and put them to his work.
[17] He will take the tenth of your sheep: and ye shall be his servants.
[18] And ye shall cry out in that day because of your king which ye shall have chosen you; and the LORD will not hear you in that day.
[19] Nevertheless the people refused to obey the voice of Samuel; and they said, Nay; but we will have a king over us;
[20] That we also may be like all the nations; and that our king may judge us, and go out before us, and fight our battles.

     Maybe someday we’ll stop being spoiled children and learn to fight our own “battles”, and do everything we can as close to home as we can.  Until then, the song remains the same.  Elect a King, and he’ll put your asses to work.


Comments
on Oct 13, 2010

All true - up to a point.  But it seems you have missed the tea Party (or perhaps are just dismissing it).  It seems at least for those 20-30% of the people, they are "rebelling" against the very thing you describe accurately.

While the Tea Party mantra is taxes, the underlying theme is federalism.  That, more than any individual, is what is driving them to become active, when demographics indicate most have been complacent in the past.

Will it last?  Will they stay true to their founding?  I guess if you are a pessimist the answer is no.  I hope they do (I should say we), as I see the Tea Party as the last chance we have to stop the "Royalization" of this country.

on Oct 13, 2010

I hope they do (I should say we), as I see the Tea Party as the last chance we have to stop the "Royalization" of this country.

When I hear people say things like "it's the way things have always been" (which is not true), I tend to look at the Tea Party as people who would tell them "and this is the reason we fight". It's ironic that this current administration was all about change yet it is the Tea Party that is actually looking for the real change we need since this administration failed to actually change things, they simply modified what already existed to their liking. kinda like taking down a picture off the wall and replacing it with another. Not exactly change.

As long as people make themselves dependent of a higher person, things will never truly change.

on Oct 13, 2010
You've yet to write a return blog. I'll have to believe in the sincerity of your return if I'm to comment
on Oct 13, 2010

 You've yet to write a return blog. I'll have to believe in the sincerity of your return if I'm to comment

on Oct 13, 2010

I do not believe in "I am leaving" blogs nor any reason to write a returning one.  I judge each article on its own merits, not on the history of the author.

on Oct 13, 2010

welcome back Baker.  Nice to see you again.   We really missed you alot when you left. 

as far as "kings" go, there is nothing new under the sun.  We're still waiting for our shining knight who is going to save the day only to be disappointed yet again.  There is no King like Christ the King and maybe that's the whole point.  Maybe that's exactly what he's trying to teach us.   

on Oct 14, 2010

as far as "kings" go, there is nothing new under the sun. We're still waiting for our shining knight who is going to save the day only to be disappointed yet again. There is no King like Christ the King and maybe that's the whole point. Maybe that's exactly what he's trying to teach us.

People thought a king of a different color might be the solution and look where that lead us. Perhaps it's not a king that we need but maybe a queen. Hmmm.....

on Oct 14, 2010

Perhaps it's not a king that we need but maybe a queen. Hmmm.....

Royalty is as Royalty does.  It matters not if it is a king, queen (or as they all are) a court jester.  Or if he is an R or D.

on Oct 14, 2010

Royalty is as Royalty does. It matters not if it is a king, queen (or as they all are) a court jester. Or if he is an R or D.

I don't know, I may be less aggressive had the President been a woman, Obama's wife for example as oppose to him. Nice legs, long black,  brunette or red hair and a pretty smile might actually convince me that freedom of speech is so yesterday.

on Oct 15, 2010

Another interesting article Bakerstreet. And comments too!  

We shall all don our togas and go to the local forum to debate politics and manage ourselves. It doesn’t seem to work out that way.

Again, it seems to be Liberals/Progressives who have difficulty debating politics and managing themselves. I'm thinking of Bill O"Reilly appearing on THE VIEW, telling the truth about Muslims of 9/11 and Whoopi and Joy Behar, the 2 would-be "queens" of the show, walking out!  

Each time more of what we need done, and the money it takes to pay for it, shifts to Washington. Then there’s disasters, famine, flood... fear. When something needs fixin, we want Daddy to cut through all the red tape and just do it.

America used to be a nation of doers and producers. Again, by design, it's the Liberal/Progressive ruling class who have set in motion a change of attitude. Way too many Americans look to Washington to control and provide their everything in life.

Sadly, we don’t care.

I disagree. I say we are finally waking up to the fact that the Constitution and our inalienable rights have been trappled long enough and that government accumulation of power and control over citizens must end. Hopefully, this coming election, we will do something about it. This would be king and elite ruling class can be disposed and will be.

 

 

 

on Oct 15, 2010

DrGuy:

But it seems you have missed the tea Party (or perhaps are just dismissing it). It seems at least for those 20-30% of the people, they are "rebelling" against the very thing you describe accurately.

Yes, yes, yes.

Right now, we have Obama, a would be king, and a Liberal ruling class  who by feasting on taxpayer's money have profited from controlling their fellow Americans and the Tea Party is on to them.

Will it last? Will they stay true to their founding? I guess if you are a pessimist the answer is no. I hope they do (I should say we), as I see the Tea Party as the last chance we have to stop the "Royalization" of this country.

I don't know if the TP is our last chance, but it is definitely playing a big, big part exposing the dirty deeds of Obama's regime.

 

 

on Jan 10, 2011

No matter who you vote for, the government always wins.

(meet the new king, same as the old king....)